Debunking the “Well at least Ron Paul is better than Obama” argument

When the left  criticizes Ron paul or libertarianism in general, many libertarians pull the “Well Obama is EVEN worse” argument. Here’s one example I saw just now.

They set up this false dichotomy where you can’t hate both Ron Paul and Obama at the same time. If you criticize Ron Paul, you’re a statist Obamabot or some shit like that.

Fuck that. That argument makes absolutely NO fucking sense. Ron Paul sucks dick. Libertarianism sucks dick. Obama sucks dick. Liberals suck dick. 

It’s possible to hate them all. 

I shouldn’t even have to post about this. It seems mind numbingly obvious. But apparently not.

28 Notes/ Hide

  1. cash4oneness reblogged this from greenstate and added:
    “Making the world resources adequate can’t be accomplished through political system competition. All politics are...
  2. sinidentidades reblogged this from anticapitalist
  3. jewnicorn666 reblogged this from greenstate
  4. greenstate reblogged this from anticapitalist and added:
    hey look, it’s what i have been trying to say for an entire calendar year. you don’t have to choose between obama and...
  5. the-cranberry-tales said: Usually it’s a leftist who praises Obama though.
  6. f-m-a-c reblogged this from anticapitalist and added:
    me that if fewer people used “sucks dick” as an insult, it might be easier for a person with a penis
  7. theresmorethanjustbeing said: Libertarians are probably the.most stable one of the ideology family. If everything sucks dick….do something about it. You can’t hate every perspective.
  8. phoenixsingerpdx reblogged this from tsotchke
  9. tsotchke reblogged this from anticapitalist
  10. anticapitalist posted this